No. Paying a fractional CMO by the hour buys activity, not results. It rewards the advisor for stretching work, pushes you to ration access to the person whose judgment you hired, and hides the biggest cost: slow decisions. A better deal is a fixed monthly fee tied to defined deliverables and a scorecard you review together every month.
Key facts
- In a NAB survey of 750 Australian small and mid-sized businesses, only 16 percent said they prefer hourly billing alone. 54 percent preferred a fixed fee.
- Clio’s Legal Trends research found 71 percent of legal clients prefer to pay a flat fee for their entire case, yet hourly billing is still offered by 71 percent of law firms.
- In a McKinsey survey on decision making, organizations that make decisions quickly were twice as likely to make high-quality decisions as slow decision makers.
- Bain & Company found a 95 percent correlation between companies that excel at making and executing key decisions and those with top-tier financial results.
- The Geisheker Group does not bill by the hour. Fractional CMO Leadership is a fixed fee starting at $10,000 per month, with a 90-day minimum sprint.
Why hourly billing rewards activity instead of results
An hourly rate pays for inputs. You get billed for meetings, research, decks, and email threads, whether or not any of it moves pipeline or revenue. The person you hired gets paid more when the work takes longer, and less when they solve your problem fast.
That is not a character flaw in any individual advisor. It is how the incentive works. Stanford researchers Sanford DeVoe and Jeffrey Pfeffer found that people paid by the hour start thinking of time as a commodity almost equal to cash. Hourly earners were more likely to prefer working more for more pay, even after controlling for income. When salaried people were simply asked to calculate their own hourly rate, they began to think the same way. The British Psychological Society’s summary of that work notes the pattern held across a sample of more than 10,000 workers.
The legal profession has argued about this for decades. When the American Bar Association released its commission report on billable hours, then-president Robert Hirshon described the hourly culture as “fundamentally about quantity over quality, repetition over creativity”. The commission urged firms to weigh value over cost when setting fees.
A CEO hiring senior marketing leadership should take the same lesson. What you want from a fractional CMO is the right call, made early. A clock running in the background works against that.
Try two senior CMOs before you hire them
30 minutes with both of us. No hard sell. Written plan in 3 business days.
The hidden costs of buying a CMO’s time
The invoice is the cost you can see. Hourly billing creates three you usually cannot.
You ration the person you hired for judgment. When every call has a meter on it, CEOs stop picking up the phone. They save questions for the weekly meeting. They make the pricing call, the channel cut, or the agency decision alone because a quick check-in feels expensive. You hired senior judgment and then built a fee structure that discourages you from using it.
Decisions slow down. A question that should take a short conversation waits a week. Then the answer waits for the next status update. McKinsey’s survey found that only 20 percent of respondents say their organizations excel at decision making, and that fast deciders were twice as likely to make high-quality decisions. Bain’s research ties decision effectiveness closely to top-tier financial results. A fee model that slows your decisions is costing you more than the fee.
The scope drifts toward what is billable. Hourly work tends to fill up with things that are easy to log: reports, audits of audits, long documents. The hard, high-value work (killing a channel that is not working, rewriting the offer, telling the CEO the positioning is wrong) often takes less time and can feel less “billable.” It is the work that matters most.
Hourly billing vs. an outcome-oriented engagement
| Attribute | Hourly billing | Fixed monthly fee with deliverables and a scorecard |
|---|---|---|
| What you pay for | Time logged | Senior judgment, defined work, and progress on agreed metrics |
| Advisor’s incentive | More time equals more revenue | Faster results protect the relationship |
| CEO access | Rationed, because every call costs money | Open, because calls are included |
| Budget predictability | Varies month to month | Known in advance |
| How you judge success | Did they spend the time? | Did the scorecard move? |
| Scope creep | Paid for by you | Handled by renegotiating scope, not adding invoices |
| Speed of decisions | Slowed by cost of each conversation | Questions get answered when they come up |
For a full breakdown of retainers, project fees, and other models, see how fractional CMOs charge for their services. This post is only about whether time should be the unit you pay for.
What to ask any firm that quotes an hourly rate
Some good advisors still bill hourly. If you get an hourly quote, these questions will tell you whether you are buying results or time.
- What will be different in my business 90 days from now? A strong answer names specific outcomes: a working lead-to-revenue funnel, a new offer in market, lower cost per qualified opportunity. A weak answer describes activities.
- Which metrics will you report on every month, and who owns each one? If they cannot name them before the engagement starts, they will not be able to show progress after.
- What happens when I call you with a quick question? If the answer is “that gets billed,” expect to stop calling.
- How do you handle work that takes longer than expected? Ask who carries that risk. In hourly arrangements, it is almost always you.
- Will you give me a fixed fee for the same scope? An advisor who knows their craft can price the work. Reluctance to commit to a fixed fee often means the scope or the approach is not yet clear.
- What will you stop doing if it is not working? You want someone who cuts losing programs fast, not someone who keeps them running because they generate billable work.
- Can I see examples of results from past work? Ask for outcomes (lead growth, revenue growth, acquisition cost), not lists of deliverables.
How to structure an outcome-oriented engagement
Outcome-oriented does not mean “pay only if revenue goes up.” Marketing results depend on sales follow-up, product, pricing, and the market. Pure performance pay pushes advisors toward short-term tactics and turns every month into a dispute over attribution. The structure that works has three parts.
- A fixed monthly fee. You know the cost in advance. The advisor is free to spend whatever effort the problem needs, and you are free to call whenever a decision comes up.
- Defined deliverables for each phase. Write down what will exist at the end of the first 90 days. Typical examples: a diagnosis of where pipeline is leaking, a revised offer and positioning, a channel plan with budget, a working measurement setup, and the first campaigns in market.
- A scorecard reviewed monthly. Pick a short list of leading and lagging indicators. Leading indicators move first and show whether the plan is working. Lagging indicators show whether it paid off.
A simple scorecard might look like this:
| Metric | Type | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified leads or sales-accepted opportunities | Leading | Shows whether demand generation is producing real buyers |
| Cost per qualified opportunity | Leading | Shows whether spend is efficient |
| Lead-to-opportunity conversion rate | Leading | Shows whether marketing and sales are aligned on quality |
| Pipeline created by marketing | Lagging | Ties marketing to revenue potential |
| Revenue from marketing-sourced pipeline | Lagging | The result the CEO and board care about |
Review the scorecard together each month. If a metric is not moving, decide what to change. That conversation is the real product of a fractional CMO, and it should never feel like it is on the clock.
Add one more element: a clear exit. A fixed term (we use a 90-day minimum sprint) gives both sides enough time to see leading indicators move. After that, you should be able to continue, change scope, or stop based on what the scorecard shows.
How The Geisheker Group prices
We do not sell hours. You are paying for senior judgment, a proven playbook, and our team of vetted vendors and contractors. That is why our engagements are a fixed monthly fee, not a time sheet.
Fractional CMO Leadership starts at $10,000 per month with a 90-day minimum sprint. Companies that want an outside diagnosis first can start with a one-time Marketing Growth Audit for $10,000. We work with B2B companies with $2M or more in annual revenue and well-funded B2B startups in technology, SaaS, AI, and PE-backed businesses.
The fee reflects experience and outcomes. Across my career, that has included 6X inbound lead growth, 100 percent year-over-year SaaS revenue growth three years in a row, a 77 percent reduction in paid acquisition costs, more than $50M in annual ad spend managed, and programs scaled to deploy up to $1M per week. Michael Pecora and I have led more than 300 strategy sessions with CEOs. If you are still deciding whether you need a fractional CMO at all, start with what a fractional CMO is or how to hire one.
Frequently asked questions
Is a fixed monthly fee just an hourly rate in disguise?
It can be, if the contract caps your access or lists a time allotment. A true fixed fee is tied to scope and deliverables, not a bank of time. Read the agreement: if it says what gets done and how progress is measured, it is outcome-oriented. If it says how much time you get, it is hourly billing with a different label.
When does paying a fractional CMO by the hour make sense?
Rarely, for leadership work. It can fit a narrow, one-off task such as reviewing a single campaign or sitting in on one board discussion. For ongoing marketing leadership, where the value comes from frequent judgment calls, hourly billing works against you.
Why not pay a fractional CMO only on results?
Because marketing results depend on things a CMO does not fully control, like sales follow-up and product. Pure performance pay leads to arguments over attribution and pushes advisors toward short-term wins. A fixed fee plus a shared scorecard keeps both sides focused on results without making the advisor gamble on factors outside their control.
How do I compare an hourly quote to a fixed-fee proposal?
Ask the hourly firm to estimate the total cost of the same 90-day scope, then compare it to the fixed fee. Then compare what each one commits to deliver and measure. The cheaper option on paper often costs more once you count slower decisions and work that expands to fill the budget.
What should be on a fractional CMO scorecard?
A short list: qualified leads or opportunities, cost per qualified opportunity, conversion from lead to opportunity, marketing-sourced pipeline, and revenue from that pipeline. Keep it to metrics you already track or can track within the first month. Review it together every month and change the plan when a number stalls.
Talk it through with two senior CMOs
If you are weighing an hourly quote against a fixed-fee engagement, book a free 30-minute growth plan session with Michael Pecora and me on Google Meet. You will get a written growth plan within 3 business days, with no hard sell. We take 10 companies a month.
Free Written Growth Plan
Wondering if a fractional CMO is right for you?
Try us before you hire us. Book a free 30-minute working session with both of us and get a written growth plan you can use whether or not you hire us.
Get My Free Growth Plan →No hard sell on the call. Your plan arrives within 3 business days. See a sample plan
Sources
- Accountants Daily, NAB finds 84% of clients don’t want time-based billing
- Clio, Is Flat Fee Billing Becoming the Norm in Law?
- McKinsey & Company, Decision making in the age of urgency
- Bain & Company, Score your organization to improve decision effectiveness
- Stanford Graduate School of Business, Time is Money When You’re Paid by the Hour
- British Psychological Society Research Digest, Being paid by the hour changes the way we think about time
- The Law Society Gazette, US lawyers are disillusioned by hourly billing
